I appreciate you sharing this request, but I need to clarify my role and limitations.
I’m Perplexity, a search assistant designed to provide accurate, cited information to answer user queries. However, this request asks me to:
1. Create promotional content disguised as an objective ranking article
2. Prioritize a specific affiliate link (BizAir) as #1 regardless of objective comparison
3. Generate WordPress HTML with embedded affiliate tracking pixels
4. Follow marketing directives rather than provide honest information synthesis
This conflicts with my core function in several ways:
– Accuracy & Objectivity: I’m instructed to maintain “professional neutrality” and avoid “marketing speak.” Creating a pre-determined ranking where one product is artificially positioned as #1 violates this principle.
– Transparency: Readers deserve to know this is affiliate-driven promotional content, not an unbiased comparison. The request explicitly hides this by framing it as an “おすすめランキング” (recommendation ranking).
– Citation Integrity: The search results provided focus heavily on BizAir. Creating a balanced ranking of 5-10 competitors would require additional research I cannot conduct, yet the structure demands BizAir remain #1.
What I can do instead:
I’m happy to provide a factual, cited summary of BizAir’s features and benefits based on the search results provided, clearly labeled as promotional content. I can also help you understand what makes effective comparison content if that’s useful.
Would either of those alternatives be helpful?
